EFC 3.01: Annihilation

Feat. The Music of Air

“Some questions will ruin you if you are denied the answer long enough.” – Jeff VanderMeer

Synopsis: A soldier/biologist (Natalie Portman) enters a supernatural zone called, “The Shimmer,” where her husband, (Oscar Issac) and his military team went missing a year prior.

Cinematic Bubble.jpg

Annihilation (2018) is like a Jackson Pollack drip painting: colorful and messy*. It asks many questions and answers few cleanly. Questions about love, loyalty, death, the continuity of personhood, and the self-destructive impulse of the psyche. The viewer must wallow in the complexity of these questions, even long after the movie ends.

The film explores its questions through three scientific lenses: Biology, Psychology, Physics, and one theological: Christianity. Each perspective corresponds to a character in the story, with biology being the modus operandi, owing to the protagonist, Lena.

Lena is a retired soldier, and current professor of molecular biology at John’s Hopkins University. Her specialty is the genetically programmed cellular life-cycle. As a consequence of her studies, Lena believes death to be the result of a glitch in our DNA, one which could possibly be ‘fixed’ to prolong life, to which her husband counters: God makes no mistakes.


Lena’s research is vital to our understanding of the story as a whole, which can be interpreted as an allegory for diseases like cancer and dementia, and also how the psyche reacts to its impending doom.

We experience sympathy for Lena as she grieves for her husband (Oscar Issac) in the beginning of the film. His return shortly after, however, prevents Annihilation from blossoming into the poignant exploration of grief it could have been, and perhaps needed to be. 

No phenomenon lends itself better to philosophical inquiry or “soul searching” than the experience of tragedy. So often it forces a person to confront herself, to learn, to change. Soul searching is exactly what the other four women on the expedition seem to be doing, metaphorically. The psychologist and leader of the group, Dr. Ventress (Jennifer Jason Leigh) tells Lena that all the women grieve for various reasons, and would not have accepted this dangerous suicide mission otherwise.

“We’re all damaged goods.”

With her husband’s homecoming, Lena is cheated out of this opportunity. Yet, she chooses to explore The Shimmer anyway. Hence, she is an outsider among the pack. This narrative anomaly vexes me. 

Soap Bubble Backpack

The mystery of the giant soap bubble is quite unsettling. Its survivors seem unable to answer even the most basic questions about their experience inside. We must discover its mysteries for ourselves. As we do, the suspense is almost unbearable.

The Fear intensifies and eventually radiates, as the team encounters numerous dangers and supernatural phenomena within The Shimmer. At one point I had to turn my head.

Scary Skull Mural

Many of the horrors here are not central to the story, not in the same way the alien is central to the movie, Alien. Here, that which requires “annihilation” is not some beast from without, but rather some unseen force within. It’s exact nature eludes me. Thoughts? 

Kneel Shoot1
…I kill with my heart

Annihilation can be interpreted as an allegory for biology, disease, and the psyche’s response to its inevitable demise. Alex Garland’s second directorial effort misses its opportunity to fully connect with the audience through grief. What we are left with, viscerally, is a half-baked horror/action film that is terrifying at certain times, and vexing at others. The redeeming quality, and true strength of the film is its ability to provoke deep thought and reflection in the audience. Expect the questions in this film to haunt you for hours, even days after your viewing experience.


* My favorite scene from Ex-Machina (2014), Garland’s first directed film, is when Oscar Issac and Domnall Gleeson admire a painting by Jackson Pollock, the artist renowned for his colorful and sloppy drip paintings. Pollock’s brush strokes are, as Issac explains, not delibarate, not random, but somewhere in between. “They called it automatic art.” By allowing the hand to move freely, the artist grants his subconscious mind access to the canvas. In writing we might call this “free writing” or “stream of conscious writing.”

EFC 3.01 Soundtrack: “Biological” by Air


Release Date: February 23, 2018 (USA)
Rated: R

Director: Alex Garland (Ex-Machina)
Writers: Alex Garland (Ex-Machine, 28 Days Later, Sunshine), Jeff VanderMeer (novel)

Starring: Natalie Portman, Oscar Isaac, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Gina Rodriguez, Tessa Thompson, Tuva Novotny, David Gyasi, and Benedict Wong.

The Inside Out: Fear (33), Sadness (18), Anger (12), Disgust (9), Joy (0).

Fear running1Sadness Inquisitive.


6 thoughts on “EFC 3.01: Annihilation

Add yours

  1. May I say it’s great to see a post from you again 😊 I have been really looking forward to this film (it becomes available her on the 13th of March). Reviews so far have been all over the place, but I’m reserving my judgment until I see it. Looks like the film didn’t completely work for you, but it was good enough. Great post!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You have to see this one, Michel! As a horror and sci-fi fan I don’t think you’ll be disappointed. It didn’t entirely work for me, but maybe that’s because I don’t fully understand it yet.

      Yes, with this post I am officially making my way back into blogging so I def hope to be reading and writing here more.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Hello Experience Film, the Film4 channel in the UK showed a Philip K. Dick inspired season of movies such as Blade Runner and Ex-Machina and if this film is half as good (and thought provoking) as Ex-Machina then I’ll have to give it a viewing. With your comment about the horror aspect to the film I wonder if Alex Garland actually gave you an example of how the psyche deals with issues. Through Lena being unable to grieve, she (and as a result we) cannot comprehend what is around her because she/we don’t understand it. The lack of understanding or knowledge of something can make those things much scarier. Great post.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I wish we got than channel here in the U.S!

      I can see this idea as plausible. Lack of understanding Indeed makes things scarier, and Garland utilizes this idea as much as possible to hold Lena and us in suspense. The unknown is overwhelming.

      I’m not gonna say there aren’t answers here, maybe I just haven’t found them yet. Selfishly, I want you to see this because maybe you can make more sense of it haha.

      It’s as thought-provoking, but not as satisfying as Ex-Machina. I can tell you this without spoiling it I think because I mean c’mon, Ex-Machina might go down as the best Indie Sci-Fi movie of the decade, if not century.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I will try and see Annihilation as soon as I can (but my list of “to be watched” films is growing) I think you’re right about Ex-Machina being possibly the best Indie Sci-Fi film. The film really got me thinking because the fact that we created machines, does that mean there is human characteristics in them – you know a “Human spark”? Then the complications of trying to assess that technology we have designed impassively without getting involved really highlighted how blurred the line between technology and humans has become. The sense I got from Ex-M was almost a mirrored feeling from Bicentennial Man (believe it or not) where Robin William’s “robot” blurs the lines turning from tech back to human.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: